D 1
Konnor D
Mrs. Zurkowski
October 1, 2010
Can you trust your local police officers? I think you can, but in some places you can’t. The problem is police corruption. In places like Los Angeles and Chicago, the corruption of the police department is a large problem. There are multiple cases where police officers are accused of taking and planting evidence. States should crackdown on corruption in the police department because if it continues to increase, the people will not know who they can trust.
The problem with police corruption is unacceptable because these “Crooked Cops” are putting innocent people in prison. One instance in particular was a center of a major account involving an Officer Rafael Perez. He was reported of stealing $1 million worth of cocaine from the evidence room. The court lightened his sentence when he told them about another incident when he and another officer “handcuffed an unarmed teenager, shot him in the head, planted a rifle near his body, and then claimed it as self-defense.” The victim, Javier Ovando, then served
D 2
23 years in prison after being paralyzed from the assault (“Police Brutality”). An instance like this is why police corruption and or police brutality needs to be stopped.
This corruption is mainly affecting certain groups of people. The main groups affected by this are the Mexicans and the African Americans. Some of the problem is coming from Community Policing. That is when citizens take the job of patrolling the streets into their own hands. “And because the police usually deal with problem citizens they have developed an us versus them mentality.”(“Policing Minority Neighborhoods (sidebar)”) The stressors like these may be what drive some officers to brutality.
There are some ways people are already starting to help this problem. The officers being accused are treated as citizens instead of getting special treatment. “Rampart police are accused of stealing drugs, falsifying reports, framing people, and abusing unarmed suspects.”(Weitzer) This was a line from an article shows that they were treated like citizens instead of being quiet about the incident it was made known. They found this is how the people are helping to stop the problem. There are some arguments against these accusations though.
One of the arguments is about profiling subjects that could be criminals. By profiling possible subjects the police could be putting criminals in prison. The problem with this is that they could also be putting innocent people in prison. Profiling is O.K. in some cases but only when it is “Criminal Profiling” and that is used to determine how an “Un-Sub”(or unknown subject) acts and reacts to situations.
A second argument is how some officers have planted drugs or evidence on known criminals to get them arrested. This is a way that police could put drug dealers away for good.
D 3
But is that really the way that we want justice to be done, by lying to the people to get the job done. Do we really want our police to stop law breakers by breaking the law themselves?
In conclusion, the amount of corruption in the police department is a large problem because it is taking innocent lives. The people it’s affecting are mainly minorities and that is causing the people to stop trusting officers. There are many ways that the people are helping to stop the problem of corruption. By profiling they could be stopping many crimes but it could be putting innocent people in prison. By planting evidence on known drug dealers they are actually helping us but is that the way we want to bring them to justice. That is why police corruption should be stopped because if we can’t trust the officers who can we trust.
Works Cited
"Police Brutality." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 24 June 2010. Web. 3
Oct. 2010. <http://www.2facts.com/article/i0102500>.
"Policing Minority Neighborhoods (sidebar)." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues &
Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 7 May 1999. Web. 3 Oct. 2010.
<http://www.2facts.com/article/ib401180>.
Weitzer, Ronald. “Can the Police Be Reformed?.” Contexts vol. 4, No. 3. Summer 2005: 21-26.
SIRS Researcher. Web. 15 Sep 2010